Why E-G-O?
For years, journalism has been the backbone of how we understand the world—giving us the facts, the stories, and the context behind global events. But lately, that freedom is under threat. Governments, corporations, and even social media algorithms are shaping what we see, often leaving us with a skewed or incomplete picture. That’s why we’re taking a different approach: instead of relying on filtered or censored reports, we go straight to the source. By analyzing local newspapers from countries around the globe, we uncover the real trends—how media in each region frames its relationship with Europe, whether it’s building bridges or putting up walls. No spin, no agendas, just the raw insights hidden in plain sight.
How does E-G-O works?
I built this project because I wanted answers—not just opinions, social medias curators or repackaged news feeds. Since I can’t be in every country reading every paper myself, I use targeted systems to gather and analyze local media at scale. But here’s the key: the tech doesn’t decide what matters. It helps me cut through the noise, track patterns in how Europe is portrayed, and flag shifts in tone or focus over time. I review the results, cross-check the context, and translate the data into clear insights—because the goal isn’t just to collect information, but to understand what it means for relations on the ground. No corporate filters, no political slant, just a straightforward look at how the world is talking about Europe, one newspaper at a time.
What? Transparency provided:
This project focuses on one thing: how countries actually talk about Europe in their own media. I track the narratives in digital and online newspapers—what’s emphasized, what’s downplayed, and how the tone shifts over time. Are European relations framed as opportunities or threats? Is cooperation celebrated, or is Europe blamed for problems? I look for patterns in word choice, recurring themes, and even what’s left unsaid, because those gaps often speak louder than headlines.
But there are limits. I’m not analyzing every tweet, TV segment, radio broadcast, or physical newspaper—just established online news outlets that shape public opinion. Small regional papers, niche platforms, or traditional media like print journals and broadcasts might slip through, and I’m not claiming to capture every perspective, just the dominant digital ones. The goal isn’t to predict the future, but to show the currents beneath the surface: the subtle ways media in each country nudges its audience to see Europe as a partner, a rival, or something in between. No hype, no guesswork—just the trends hiding in plain sight
Who is behind E-G-O?
This is a one-person project, built by someone who’s spent years working in international information security. The idea came from a simple need: in my field, you can’t just react to crises—you have to spot the early signals. I noticed that while everyone talks about geopolitical risks, few actually dig into the day-to-day media trends that shape how countries really see each other. So I started this to fill that gap, not for clients or funders, but because clear, unbiased insights make the difference between being caught off guard and seeing shifts before they escalate.
No sponsors, no agendas, no outside influence. Just analysis driven by the data, not by politics or paychecks. If it helps others in security, policy, or business make sense of the landscape, that’s a bonus. But at its core, it’s a tool I built for my own work—and now I’m sharing it because the patterns matter to more than just me.
Where does the data comes from?
The data comes from a mix of trusted digital libraries and direct sources—newspapers, official publications, and media outlets from the countries we’re tracking. Right now, it’s a work in progress: I’m still expanding the list to make sure we cover the key voices in each region. The full inventory of sources will be published soon, so anyone can see exactly where the insights are pulled from.
For now, every analysis references the original material, so you can trace the trends back to their source. No hidden feeds, no unclear origins—just publicly available media, analyzed openly. As the project grows, so will the transparency.
When are the data updated, and reports generated?
Right now, the data and reports are updated monthly. That gives me time to gather enough material to spot real trends—not just noise—and to double-check everything before it goes live. If there’s demand (or if the news cycle demands it), I’ll move to bi-weekly or even weekly updates. Daily would be the endgame, but I’d rather do it right than rush it.
For now, each update is timestamped, so you’ll always know when the latest analysis was published. And if something major happens—like a sudden shift in how a country’s media covers Europe—I’ll flag it as soon as it’s verified. No artificial deadlines, just a rhythm that matches the project’s growth.